U.S. District Court Preliminarily Approves Class Action Settlement in Action Against Debt Collector

Collectors Exposed : U.S. District Court Preliminarily Approves Class Action Settlement in Action Against Debt Collector - Collectors Exposed

Welcome to Collectors Exposed

Welcome to Collectors Exposed , like most online communities you must register to post in our community, plus there is more valuable content available to members. But don't worry this is a simple process that requires minimal information. Take advantage of it immediately, Register Now or Sign In.

As a member you can:

Start new topics and reply to others
Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
Add events to our community calendar
Get your own profile and make new friends
Customize your experience here
View forums which have content only available to members
Obtain access to "self help" information, such as sample pleadings and the like
Obtain access to valuable case law we have compiled

Guest Message by DevFuse

Page 1 of 1

You cannot start a new topic
You cannot reply to this topic

U.S. District Court Preliminarily Approves Class Action Settlement in Action Against Debt Collector

#1 TURNER LAW OFFICES

Advanced Member

Group: Law Professional
Posts: 80
Joined: 17-January 11
LocationATLANTA, GA

Posted 20 February 2012 - 12:33 PM

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio granted preliminary approval to a class action settlement for unlawful debt collection practices by a law firm based in Lebanon, Ohio.

CINCINNATI, OH, February 16, 2012 /24-7PressRelease/ -- The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio granted preliminary approval to a class action settlement for unlawful debt collection practices by a law firm based in Lebanon, Ohio. The class action lawsuit was brought by the law firm of Minnillo & Jenkins, Co. LPA on behalf of Zachary Langendorfer.

The complaint alleges that the Lebanon law firm of Kaufman & Florence filed collection suits in the Lebanon Municipal Court on behalf of Lebanon Citizens National Bank and against consumers who lived in other counties, which violates the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA") and a parallel state law requiring consumer collection actions to be brought in the county where the consumer resides or where they signed the contract sued on. The defendants deny liability but have agreed to a settlement under which each individual who was sued or had other legal action taken against them in the wrong county during the two years prior to the filing of the class action will receive $600.00.

Because the case was settled, the court did not determine the full extent of the defendants' liability, however, the court did issue a significant preliminary ruling holding that an FDCPA violation occurs when a debt collector takes any legal action against a consumer (including filing motions for summary judgment, seeking to conduct a debtor examination or pursuing garnishment) in the wrong jurisdiction, and not just when the debt collector first files a collection lawsuit.

This ruling is important because the FDCPA has a short, one-year, statute of limitations and consumers sued in the wrong jurisdiction like the affected individuals in this case often do not learn they have been sued for months or even years, sometimes more than a year after the debt collection was filed. The FDCPA is a federal law that applies to debt collectors who are collecting consumer debts.

This post has been edited by TURNER LAW OFFICES: 20 February 2012 - 12:50 PM